Most AI advisors are technologists reaching toward finance. I'm a markets practitioner who builds the systems. Seven years on Citi's MBS desk, then production AI and data at scale, now embedded in your firm as fractional AI leadership.
The category is full of AI generalists who treat "financial services" as one more industry slide. They have never priced a bond, run a P&L, or shipped to a regulator. I have. I spent seven years building real-time pricing, P&L, and risk systems on a $85B mortgage desk, then ran data and AI products at Disney Streaming scale.
That order matters. I build agentic systems that work inside the constraints a trading desk, a risk team, and an allocator actually operate under, because I have sat in those seats.
"Most agents fail because the data underneath them was never ready, and because whoever built them never understood the business they were built for."
A fractional CAIO is only useful when the fit is exact. This is who the engagement is designed for, and who it is not.
A demo impresses the offsite, then dies on contact with real positions, real latency, and real accountability. There was no operating model to carry it into production.
Agents are only as good as the foundations beneath them. Lineage, quality, and governance get skipped, and the system fails quietly where it costs the most.
The people selling AI rarely know what an axe, an RFQ, or a model-risk regime is. Their tools fight your constraints instead of working within them.
Embedded executive leadership, not a project that ships and disappears. I sit with your team, carry the strategic thread across quarters, and leave you with capability you keep.
Translate board-level pressure into a sequenced, ROI-anchored roadmap tied to your business: which use cases, in what order, against which P&L or risk outcome.
Stand up governance the firm can defend: acceptable-use policy, model-risk controls, audit trails, and review cadence aligned to your regulatory surface.
Architect and oversee the agentic systems themselves, on your infrastructure, inside your perimeter, so the capability stays with your team instead of a vendor.
Independent, conflict-free assessment of buy-versus-build and vendor selection from someone with no referral fees and a markets background to judge fit.
Clear, credible updates that an investment committee or board will actually trust: progress, governance health, and where the next dollar should go.
Build internal AI literacy and capability so the firm grows past needing me, which is the point of a fractional engagement done well.
Proof that does not survive a find-and-replace. Each line is a seat I actually sat in.
Strategy backed by hands on the system. The agentic and data layers I design, oversee, and can build directly. The build practice lives at applied-agents.ai.
Three ways in, scoped to where you are. Every engagement starts with a working call to confirm fit before anything is signed.
A time-boxed engagement to produce a sequenced AI roadmap, a governance baseline, and a clear buy-versus-build call. The fastest way to turn pressure into a plan.
Ongoing executive ownership of your AI agenda: roadmap, governance, build oversight, vendor decisions, and board reporting. Embedded in your leadership team across quarters.
Defined-scope work: a specific agentic system to architect and ship, a model-risk review, a vendor evaluation, or standing advisory presence for an internal team.
A consultant delivers a project and leaves. A fractional CAIO is embedded in your leadership team over time, owns the AI roadmap, attends the meetings, makes ongoing vendor and build decisions, and is accountable for outcomes across quarters. The goal is to build capability you keep, not a dependency.
No. The architecture is designed to stay inside your data perimeter. Systems run on your infrastructure and your cloud, which is non-negotiable for trading, risk, and allocator data and is built in from the first design decision rather than bolted on.
Because the differentiator is real domain experience, not a vertical learned for a pitch. Seven years on a mortgage desk and hedge-fund risk work mean I know what a desk, a risk team, and an allocator actually do, and I build agents that work within those constraints. Outside finance, that edge stops applying, which is why this page commits to it.
It depends on scope and maturity. A flagship embedded engagement is part-time executive presence on a retainer with a three-month minimum. Sprints and defined-scope advisory are sized to the work. We confirm the right shape on the first call before anything is committed.
Pricing is scoped to the engagement and discussed on the working call, once the fit and shape are clear. Every engagement is bespoke to your firm's regulatory surface and maturity, so a fixed menu would misrepresent the work.
For seven years I built the pricing, P&L, and risk systems traders actually used on Citi's mortgage desk, then led data and AI products at Disney Streaming scale. This practice is where those two halves meet: executive AI leadership for capital markets and asset management firms, plus the agentic systems — built through my firm, Applied Agents — to back the strategy up.
I take on a small number of firms at a time, embedded closely enough to be accountable for what actually ships.
Start with a working call. We confirm whether there is a fit before anything is signed.
camille@applied-agents.ai